It was not, and still is not, easy to answer so many questions. By
1996 we had distilled our list down to three focused criteria: Drive
to be successful on the highest level; Present and future talent;
and Attitude towards people, their job and their environment. These
three areas must be covered to the interviewer's satisfaction. Otherwise,
the employer will have to wait until someone manages to demonstrate
themselves in these areas.
Drive to be successful
In our experience, we have learned that one's drive to be successful
can be an indicator of how far that person can go. Drive directs everything
in life. People can be nearly anything if they have enough drive to
be so. Many seemingly impossible tasks have been accomplished because
of a strong drive to do so. Humans have been to the moon and moved
mountains because they had the drive to do it.
If we take a look at successful people, we will see that their
success stems from their foundation, which is drive. They are inspired
to be somebody or do something. Becoming what you want to become
is often a journey that begins as a little boy or girl. Having drive
gives one the power to push people further. It takes drive to survive
and triumph in the toughest situations.
During the past sixteen years, we have seen many of the most talented
people fail simply because they didn't have enough drive to reach
their destinations. We have also seen cases of people who survive
even though they were perhaps not very talented. But their drive
got them through and helped them develop the required talent to
be successful. That is why when hiring staff, we check whether the
individual's drive is strong and matched with our company's objective
and culture.
Present and Future talent
Talent is one's capacity for accomplishment. We desire the most
talented people so that we can grow faster than the industry. We
need people suited for the long run. We should take every step to
obtain as many qualified resumes as possible so that we have a larger
pool to select from. The top successful applicants will fill a position.
However, some companies feel that they are inferior to larger, or
better-known, companies and cannot attract a large number of qualified
applicants. Likewise, sometimes prominent companies are misled by
believing that they will get the most talented applicants simply
because of their reputation.
We do not rank companies on a scale based on profits. We believe
that, like people, companies are fundamentally equal and may be
ranked more appropriately by the quality of life that they create
for their employees. Large, stable, reputable companies are only
that way because of their stockholders--it has nothing to do with
their employees if they do not focus on bettering their employee's
quality of life. The underlying question that should be addressed
is this: What is the quality of life of each company's employees?
We do not compare employees on an individual basis according to
income, and this applies to the entire company as well. Everyone
desires and deserves happiness no matter for which company that
employee works. It is up to the company's Human Resource Policy
to ensure the quality of life for its employees.
Back to Criteria…
Achievement is the benchmark in judging talent. There really should
not be any other test but to test for talent. We believe a four-year
grading system should be adequate. Higher grades show one's ability
to understand, analyze and organize as well as one's level of responsibility.
During four years of studying, students take, on average, more than
50 exams. This is enough to measure real talent as they were on
their own and not tested only under a single specific circumstance.
For those with work experience, their achievement in the workplace
counts and is more important to us than total years of experience.
Achievement can indicate how far a person may develop. Future development
is also important. We are not looking simply at the talent they
currently possess, but at their potential as well.
During an interview session, we try to let the applicants sell
themselves. We give them a chance to describe themselves, and tell
us why they should be chosen to work for our company. We do not
believe in standardized tests or incoming exams because tests cannot
judge what a candidate is able and willing to contribute to any
significant degree. We want them to give us a picture of themselves
as they see themselves because they should be more capable of this
than anyone. Unfortunately, most applicants are not prepared
for such questions. It takes time to develop an answer.
Attitudes toward people, job and environment
Attitude is the navigator of one's life. All of our decisions are
based on the way we understand people, our job and our environment.
Talent is important, but it is our attitude that controls the direction
in which we place our talent. Sometimes talented people fail simply
because they do not have a good attitude to keep them directed on
the right course.
Talented people are easier to find than people with a good attitude.
Sometime the most talented people are not the best suited for a
position because they may have other issues that become evident
in the workplace, such as satisfying their ego, among other things.
Having an excellent attitude is a must, and it is often a good indicator
of heart.
Sometimes we can find those with a good attitude by observing their
hobbies and interests. But another important place for observation
is that of their relationships with friends and coworkers. By hiring
employees with a good attitude, a company will reduce conflict and
unnecessary politics substantially.
When compared to drive and talent, attitude carries more weight.
This is because a person of the right attitude will impress the
interviewer--we welcome the person with whom we feel we can work.